Developing
a Pop Religious Movement (PRM) within this semester has been a eye-opening task
as it brought to my attention the attributes, structure and foundations of what
forms and constitutes a religion. Legitimacy, sacred texts, beliefs, a creation
story and rituals are some of the many characteristics which are fundamental to
the formation of a Pop Religious Movement. This review will look at the
processes and decision making behind the development of our very own Pop
Religious Movement, Perfectology.
At the
beginning of our task the several elements which needed to be considered and
included to form our Pop Religious Movement was quite extensive. Firstly, the
decision on whether our religion should stem from, or be based on, a mainline
faith, or a distinct separate perspective and structure, was a topic thoroughly
discussed. As a result, we established that Perfectology, a religion whose
prime ideal is to 'strive to be perfect as we were made in our Creator's image',
corresponded somewhat with the beliefs of many Christian denominations. However,
our group decided that although Perfectology resembled similar beliefs to
several Christian faiths, it would be a religion which broke away from
Christianity as the creators of Perfectology noticed the 'lack' of emphasis placed
on striving for perfection, which they believed should be a fundamental goal within
a religion. This conclusion was accumulated from the Bible verse (Matthew
54:8), "You therefore must be perfect, as your
heavenly Father is perfect.” Therefore, we discussed how the creators of
Perfectology formulated their own beliefs on how the world and each individual
was created and the core beliefs and stages that would help one attain
perfection.
Hjarvard
(2008, p.6) and Clark (2011, p.114) argue that the media has become a primary
source for imitating the presence of a community and sense of spiritual
leadership which used to be essentially provided by institutionalised
religions. In saying this,
our group began analysing whether our religion would be community-based and
institutionalised, or individualistic and privatised. Here, our group decided
Perfectology would consist of elements from both. With regards to community,
Perfectology gives opportunities for individuals to interact with others. These
included Perfectology services each week and meditation and reflection seminars.
Our religion however is also strongly individualistic and privatised as it places
strong emphasis on the development of oneself, focusing on how to improve
yourself as an individual during perfection stages and can be largely
privatised due to our website and information that can assist people in
practising at home.
After reading McDannell's article Scrambling
the sacred and the profane, our group began to look at whether our religion had
a sense of the transcendent or the sacred and whether they were apart or
interconnected. Comparing both Durkheim's argument that the religious life and
profane life cannot exist in the same place, to Tilich's argument that the
sacred can be seen in the profane, our group came to the conclusion our
religion would be formulated in Tilich's approach (McDannell, p.136-142). Our
Pop Religious Movement Perfectology saw the profane elements of one's life can
lead to perfection, that our worldly assets and what is seen throughout the
media as 'perfect' is what our religion is fundamentally all about. Ward's
article also was quite helpful when looking at our religion's structure and
hierarchy. Ward (2011, p. 57-59) discusses the notion of the star as a semi-divine
figure of worship. In
society, celebrities are seen by many as the 'ideal of perfection' in which
people almost worship and put on a pedestal these figures. Our religion therefore
uses this view, holding celebrities as those who have reached higher
'perfection' and are examples of how to strive for perfection.
In
conclusion, our religion Perfectology provides individuals with the ability to
spiritually transcend through the "Perfection" levels to reach their
ultimate goal - to reach spiritual perfection and a relationship with our
perfect Creator through a complete balance of all levels of the Perfectionism
Scale. This process helped me analyse the theoretical components of new, mediated and branded religious
movements and helped bring these discoveries forth in our very own religion
Perfectology.
References
Clark,
L, S. (2011). Religion and Authority in a Remix Culture. In Lynch, G. M.,
Jolyon, S., &
Strhan, A. (Eds.), Religion, Media and
Culture: A Reader (pp.111-121). London & New York: Routledge.
Hjarvard,
S. (2008). The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory of the Media as Agents of
Religious Change. Northern Lights, 6(1), 9-26. doi: 10.1386/nl.6.1.9/1
McDannell,
C. (2012). Scrambling the Sacred and the Profane. In Lynch G. and J. Mitchell
with A. Strhan. (Eds.), Religion, Media and Culture: A Reader
(pp.135-146). London & New York: Routledge.
The Holy Bible. (2010). Charlotte, NC: Saint Benedict
Press.
Ward, P. (2011). Gods Behaving Badly: Media
Religion and Celebrity Culture. London: SCM Press.
